|
LAMBTON |
||
|
|
||
|
SPECIAL EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE |
||
|
|
||
|
Thursday, |
|
7:00 p.m. |
|
March 31, 2005 |
Room 141 |
|
|
M I N
U T E S |
|
PRESENT: |
Rose Gallaway, St. Clair
Child and Youth Services |
|
|
Al Kuhn, Community Living
Chatham-Kent |
|
|
Marion Lennan, |
|
|
Ryan Lester (for |
|
|
Lisa Matthews, Learning
Disabilities Association of |
|
|
Graham McIntyre, Trustee |
|
|
Maggie Rochon, Easter Seal
Society of |
|
|
Donna Scherer, Learning
Disabilities Association of Chatham-Kent (Vice-Chair) |
|
|
Charlene Taylor, Member
"at large" |
|
|
Jonathan Quaglia, Member
"at large" |
|
|
Wenda Vallee, Autism Society of |
|
|
Janet Vanderwerf, Member "at large" |
|
|
Mary Weerdenburg, Pathways
Health Centre for Children |
|
|
|
|
REGRETS: |
Susie Jones, Trustee |
|
|
Duncan Longwell, Trustee (Chair) |
|
|
Laurie Mawlam, Community
Living Wallaceburg |
|
|
|
|
RESOURCE STAFF: |
Denise Emery, Chris Gordon, and Debbie Seager, Special Education Co-ordinators |
|
********************************************************************************** |
|
1.0 |
CALL TO ORDER AND APPROVAL
OF AGENDA - 7:00 p.m. |
|
2.0 |
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF
2005 02 24 |
|
|
The Minutes of 2005 02 24 were approved as written. |
|
3.0 |
BUSINESS ARISING FROM
MINUTES The following documents were distributed regarding Educational Assistants, ISA 1 Equipment, and Special Education Training for Administrators: · Educational Assistant Job Profile · ISA 1 Equipment Provincial Statistics, 2002-03 · ISA 1 Equipment Administrative Procedures · Ontario Principals’ Council “Special Education and the Principalship” Binder (circulated). |
|
4.0 |
PRESENTATIONS |
|
|
|
4.1 |
Physical Disabilities
Program Review Committee The Physical Disabilities Program Review Committee presented their findings to SEAC. Members of the Committee included: · Terry Bresee, Community Care Access Centre · Tim DeActis, Principal · Mike Gilfoyle, Vice-Principal · Chris Gordon, Special Education Co-ordinator* · Mark Griffin, Pathways Health Centre for Children ·
· Anne Johnston, Parent · Maggie Rochon, SEAC Member* · Jim Roe, Parent · Dave Schaller, Pathways Health Centre for Children* · Stacey Smith, Principal · Charlene Taylor, SEAC Member* · Mabel Thibault, Prism Centre for Audiology and Children’s Rehabilitation* · Colleen Witt, Alternative/Augmentative Communication Speech/Language Pathologist* D. Seager introduced members of the Physical Disabilities Program Review Committee in attendance (marked with an asterisk above). SEAC viewed a slide presentation prepared by C. Taylor with the assistance of her son Cody. The slide presentation outlined the mandate of the program review, the process followed, and the results. C. Taylor summarized: · The Program itself, for the most part, is effective. The largest barrier is attitudinal. · Three main areas that need improvement: physical accommodation issues, consistent communication between school staff, community practitioners, and parents, and inclusion in physical and co-curricular activities. · The recommendation is aimed at improving inclusion in the area of Physical Education and co-curricular activities: “being AT the game is not the same as being IN the game”. · The Physical Disabilities Program Review Committee is hopeful that, through education and inspiration, a philosophy of inclusion will permeate our schools. Recommendation: Every elementary school
principal will be encouraged to assign a staff member with an interest in
inclusion as an Inclusion Facilitator in Physical Education and
Extra-Curricular Activities. Action Plan: The Inclusion Facilitator will be provided an opportunity to: · Attend a workshop on practical ways to develop inclusion in Physical Education. · In-service staff in their building regarding full inclusion. · Be available as an on-going resource. · The “Active Living Binder” will be purchased for each school as a resource for staff. · Training will be provided for key staff to act as “Train the Trainer” (Active Living Coach) · A presentation at Area Principal’s Meetings regarding attitudes and strategies for inclusion in physical education activities will be made. Dave Schaller outlined the benefits of the proposed recommendation and detailed the training and resources available through the Active Living Alliance for Canadians with a Disability. After having the opportunity to ask questions and provide comments, SEAC supported the recommendation and action plan, which will be reported to the Board. D. Scherer thanked the Physical Disabilities Program Review Committee members for their hard work on behalf of the Lambton Kent District School Board. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
2003-2004 EQAO Results and
Exemption Rates Bill Woodcock, Consultant for Academic Research and Development, provided a report on “Special Needs Issues Surrounding EQAO Assessments”. A written report, along with comparison graphs were distributed to all SEAC members in advance of the meeting. Highlights included: · EQAO Definition of a Special Needs Students · The percentage of Lambton Kent District School Board special needs students in both Grades 3 and 6 have consistently been around 20%, which is 4 to 5% more than the rest of the province. · The percentage of Lambton Kent District School Board special needs students who are first time eligible to write the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test mirrors the rest of the province. ·
In the last administration of the Grade 3 and
6 EQAO assessments 23 percent of Lambton Kent District School Board special
needs students were able to reach the standard in · Lambton Kent District School Board special needs students and those in the rest of the province struggled with the writing component of the EQAO assessments in both Grades 3 and 6. · Over the past two administrations of the Grades 3 and 6 Mathematics assessments, the percentages of special needs students who demonstrated mathematical skills that were at or above the provincial standard more than doubled for both grades. · Special needs students in Applied Mathematics programs have a much more difficult time achieving the provincial standard in Grade 9 Mathematics compared to special needs students in Academic Mathematics programs. · Schools have a legal responsibility to provide accommodations for all pupils with disabilities. · According to EQAO, accommodations “change only the way in which the test is administered or the way in which the person responds to the components of the test. They do not alter the content of the test…” Modifications are not allowed. · Accommodations provided for a student on any of the EQAO assessments must be identified on the student’s IEP and be consistent with the student’s regular classroom practice. · The two most common accommodations are changes in the environment and adjustments for time allowed. · Principals are required to consider an exemption if it is determined that the student will not be able to participate in the assessment, even with accommodations. · The Lambton Kent District School Board exemption rates are below the rest of the province. SEAC had the opportunity to
ask questions throughout the presentation. J. Quaglia requested additional information on the actual number of special needs students used in determining the percentage of cohort comparisons throughout the report. G. McIntyre would like the Board to receive information on dropout rates, including the percentage of special needs students that do not reach graduation. D. Scherer thanked Mr.
Woodcock for his informative presentation. |
|
5.0 |
UPDATES TO 2002-2003
INTERNAL REVIEW OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND SERVICES A revised version of Section 2 - Psychological Services Department, was reviewed. C. Gordon highlighted updates that were made. Input/comments from SEAC included: · Provide clarification between counselling and consultation. · M. Rochon and C. Gordon commended the Psychological Services Department on the large number of assessments conducted over the course of the 2003-2004 school year. |
|
6.0 |
SPECIAL EDUCATION PLAN D. Emery reviewed the suggested revisions for the following sections of the Special Education Plan. |
|
|
|
6.1 |
Review of Section 3 - The
Board’s Special Education Advisory Committee Suggested revisions include: · Appendix 3.1.1 has been revised. · Appendix 3.1.2 has been revised. · Appendix 3.1.3 has been revised. |
|
|
6.2 |
Review of Section 4 -
Co-ordination of Services with other Ministries or Agencies Suggested revisions: · Page 76, Under Transition of Students into School from Preschool, Change the word “severe” in the 2nd sentence to “high”. · Page 76, Under Transition of Students into School from Preschool, Change the last sentence to read: “The timeline, transition protocol with community agencies, and pre-school intake forms are found in Appendices 4.1 to 4.3.” · Page 76, Under Transition of Students out of School to Community Agencies, end of 1st sentence, Change Appendix 2.9.2 to “Appendix 2.9.1”. · Page 76, Under Transition of Students out of School to Community Agencies, Remove the 3rd sentence and the last sentence. Additional changes will be made to this paragraph. ·
Page 77, Under Liaison with Community
Agencies, Add: · Appendix 4.1 has been revised and divided into four: Appendix 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4. |
|
|
6.3 |
Review of Section 5 -
Submission and Availability of School Board Plans The following revisions were suggested to Section 5 of the Plan: · Page 79, Change 2003 at the end of the 1st sentence to: 2005. · Submission Letter will be revised. |
|
7.0 |
WEB-BASED IEP REVIEW UPDATE D. Emery informed SEAC of a
setback in the implementation plans of the web-based IEP program. The owner of the company, and creator of
the web-based IEP that we were piloting, passed away suddenly during the
March Break. Family members are in the
process of re-organizing the company which has delayed our training schedule
slightly. |
|
8.0 |
CORRESPONDENCE: LETTER FROM SEAC reviewed a copy of a letter, dated 2004 02 16, sent to the Minister of Education from the Halton District School Board. The letter was in support of the ”OPSBA Position Paper on Special Education Funding”. |
|
9.0 |
ASSOCIATION REPORTS AND
OTHER BUSINESS A. Kuhn announced that
Community Living Chatham-Kent will be celebrating their 50th anniversary with
a gala on October 29, 2005. A Bag
Lunch Fundraiser will be held on May 4, 2005.
Information about the Bag Lunch Fundraiser can be obtained by
contacting Chris Harvey at (519)352-1174, Ext. 232. Also, the Parkfield store is closing, but
the restaurant will remain open and will be expanded to include a meeting
room. W. Vallee had a question
concerning the Options Program and graduation ceremonies at St. Clair
College. C. Gordon explained that St.
Clair College has a strict policy concerning their graduation
ceremonies. Currently they do not
allow recognition at their graduation ceremonies for students who complete
“certificate” programs, although meetings are ongoing to discuss the
situation. G. McIntyre informed SEAC
that local elementary teachers will elevate their work-to-rule measures on
Monday, April 4, 2005. He also
announced that the Lambton Kent District School Board has been chosen as a
partner in the province’s Best Start Plan, and that R. Gallaway provided details
of the “Our Children, Our Youth, Our Future Conference”, hosted by St. Clair
Child and Youth Services to be held at St. Christopher’s High School on Saturday,
April 9, 2005. |
|
10.0 |
QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC - None. |
|
11.0 |
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS · 2005-2006 Budget Presentation |
|
12.0 |
NEXT MEETING |
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday, April 28, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
7:00 p.m. |
|
13.0 |
ADJOURNMENT - 9:00
p.m. |
|
|
Joan Sparks, |
|
|
Recording Secretary. |